This means that the first steps in the R&D process need to be guided by an understanding of the medical need, the populations to be treated/vaccinated and the niche of the intended product in that ecosystem. VaxxCellence can advice on:
Readings:
The TPP summarizes the indication and many of the expected or desired product characteristics. Defining a TPP can be an ongoing, iterative process: the TPP guides early decision making whereas early data may result in TPP adaptations
The CDP documents the pathway from FTIH towards licensure, including early safety and dose-finding studies, age (de)-escalation studies and pivotal registration studies. Clinical development is usually made up of 3 phases, with Phase 3 studies aiming to generate critical efficacy and safety data. Phase 4 studies are done after licensure and can be critical to generate effectiveness and/or further safety data. VaxxCellence can provide advice on:
Readings:
Benefit/Risk assessment is central at every step of the R&D process because it provides the framework for stage-gate decision making. It is clear that benefit should always outweight the risks but understanding both and raising awareness of the balance can inform product and study design decisions at each phase
Readings:
Vaccines do not save lives, but vaccination does. Market access is critical for success and implementation relies on careful cost-benefit analysis. This is the area of Health Economic Outcome Research (HEOR) that hinges on modelling and real world data to estimate the impact of a treatment/vaccine on the healthcare system and quantifies how this compares with other, competing approaches